The below Supreme Court Order on renewal of passport is important for several Men accused under Section 498A of the IPC, eventhough the same does not pertain to matrimonial dispute. The Supreme Court observed that renewal of passport cannot be refused merely on the ground of pendency of criminal appeal.
The applicant was convicted for offences punishable under:
- Section 120-B
- Section 420
- Section 468
- Section 471
- Section 477 A
…of the Indian Penal Code
read with Section 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
The appeal filed by him was dismissed by the High Court. However, the sentence was reduced to a period of one year. The appeal against the High Court judgment is pending consideration before the Apex Court, as reported by Livelaw.
The accused man filed an application before the Passport authority seeking renewal of his passport. However, he was orally informed that the renewal of the passport was not being done due to the pendency of the criminal appeal before the Supreme Court.
Therefore, by filing a interlocutory application, he approached the Apex Court seeking a direction to the CBI to give no objection for renewal of his passport which expired on 12.11.2017.
The CBI opposed the plea and submitted that renewal of passport can be only after application obtains permission from the concerned trial court. They referred to the following clauses of Section 6.2 of the Passport Act, 1967 to contend that the passport authority has the power to refuse issuance of the passport in view of the pendency of the criminal appeal filed by him.
(e) that the applicant has, at any time during the period of five years immediately preceding the date of his application, been convicted by a court in India for any offence involving moral turpitude and sentenced in respect thereof to imprisonment for not less than two years;
(f) that proceedings in respect of an offence alleged to have been committed by the applicant are pending before a criminal court in India;
Referring to these provisions, the bench ofJustices L. Nageswara Rao and BR Gavai observed,
In the opinion of the Central Government the issue of a passport or travel document to the applicant will not be in the public interest.
Adding further, the bench said,
The refusal of a passport can be only in case where an applicant is convicted during the period of 5 years immediately proceeding the date of application for an offence involving moral turpitude and sentence for imprisonment for not less than two years. Section 6.2 (f) relates to a situation where the applicant is facing trial in a criminal court.
Admittedly, at present, the conviction of the appellant stands still the disposal of the criminal appeal. The sentence which he has to undergo is for a period of one year. The passport authority cannot refuse the renewal of the passport on the ground of pendency of the criminal appeal.
The top court therefore directed the passport authority to renew the passport of the applicant and said,
The passport authority is directed to renew the passport of the applicant without raising the objection relating to the pendency of the criminal appeal in this Court.
ALSO READ –
30 Men Approach NGO To Suspend Passports Of Wives Who Went On Husband’s Sponsored Study Visa & Ended Ties
Court Grants Bail To Malabar Hill Senior Citizens｜Impounds Passport On Insistence Of Estranged Daughter-in-Law
ALSO WATCH –
Interview | Kanupriya Kejriwal, Matrimonial Lawyer, Mumbai On No Maintenance To Working Wives
Join our Facebook Group or follow us on social media by clicking on the icons below