The Allahabad High Court in its recent order has observed that a matrimonial dispute case cannot be transferred according to convenience of a husband, merely because he has now been posted to a different location.
This assertion came from the Bench of Justice J. J. Munir, that was hearing the plea of Surendra Singh (husband) seeking transfer of a divorce case filed by him u/s 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 from the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Hapur to Banda or any other adjoining district.
The husband submitted to the high court that he was not in a position to pursue the case at Hapur because he is currently posted at district Banda (600 kms away) and therefore, he sought the transfer of the case from Hapur to Banda or to any other district neighbouring the district of Banda.
It was also argued by him that if the case is transferred to Banda, then both the parties can pursue the case with convenience at Banda because the opposite party (estranged wife) also resides at Rewa (M.P.) which adjoins Banda (190 kms).
Arguments by Wife
On the other hand, the counsel for the estranged wife submitted that merely because the applicant has been transferred from Hapur to Banda, he cannot ask for the transfer of this case. (Rewa to Hapur – 870 kms).
Allahabad High Court
At the outset, the high court agreed with the contention put forth by the wife that merely because the husband has now been posted to a different station, the case cannot be transferred according to his convenience. The court observed,
Convenience of Wife
The high court noted that three cases between the estranged couple are presently pending at Hapur and thus it felt that it would be convenient for both parties to pursue all the three cases at Hapur, particularly, once the wife finds it to be convenient there.
The court further remarked,
The wife’s convenience requires to be particularly considered in matters of venue of proceedings in matrimonial causes, while considering a transfer plea.
Lastly, dismissing the plea filed by the husband, the high court opined that both parties can request the Courts at Hapur to fix an identical date in all the cases in order to enable both parties to attend and effectively defend there.
ALSO READ –
Calcutta HC: “Inconvenience Of Wife Should Be Prime Consideration Where Suit Will Be Heard”
Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition Of Wife
No Husband Would File Complaint At Police Station Against Wife Unless He’s Really Fed Up With Her
We Are Not Against Live-In Relationship But Can’t Give Protection When One Of The Partners Is Married | Allahabad High Court
Allahabad High Court｜Husband Responsible To Pay Maintenance Even If Wife Chooses To Live With Child At Her Parent’s Home
READ ORDER | Allahabad HC Dismisses Paternal Grandparent’s Habeas Corpus Plea Seeking Child’s Custody From Her Maternal Grandfather
ALSO WATCH –
#Bihar | Man Gets Thrashed By Drunk In-Laws For Refusing Dowry
Join our Facebook Group or follow us on social media by clicking on the icons below
Blogging about Equal Rights for Men or writing about Gender Biased Laws is often looked upon as controversial, as many 'perceive' it Anti-Women. Due to this grey area - where we demand Equality in the true sense for all genders - most brands distance themselves from advertising on a portal like ours.
We, therefore, look forward to your support as donors who understand our work and are willing to partner in this endeavour to spread this cause. Do support our work to counter one sided gender biased narratives in the media.
To make an instant donation, click on the "Donate Now" button above. For information regarding donation via Bank Transfer, click here.
Follow Us
